Monday, February 4, 2008

The Whaler

(NOTE: A shorter version of this essay appeared in the Point Reyes Light.)

I ran six miles through the forest. A troupe of fallow and axis deer stood amongst gloomy ferns and fallen timber on the side of the trail, watching me pace by. The sun broke over the hills, glared through morning’s fog, and there was the beach. The waves clawed at it. I walked north. A flock of pelicans flew in combat formation out over the water, dipping and rising inches above the waves that reached out for them. There were dead pelicans and dead gulls scattered across the beach in crumpled piles of feathers, bones, sticks and sand. There were plastic doo-dads and hastate sea fauna and the pyogenic scum deposited on the shore by the wave’s maw. Farther ahead the waves crashed against the cliff-side, sending up a white plume that obscured the northern-most end of the beach from view and obstructed my intended passage. I walked a lazy barefoot mile, and lying there before me, beneath the gaze of brooding vultures, was a whale.

***

I grew up in the purlieu of one of the saltiest bodies of water in the world, but the Great Salt Lake’s prolific salinity is inhospitable to little more than sea-monkeys: The lake sustains a thriving brine shrimp industry. The fetid stink of the lake blows into Salt Lake when the right winds blow in from the west, imparting a vaguely maritime aroma to the city. Utah’s state bird is the sea gull, a point of mixed pride; New York has its pigeons, Salt Lake has its sea gulls. All of this can project a vivid mirage of coastal life on the land-locked desert. I was never deceived by this illusion, and so I grew up without so much as a mistaken relationship to the ocean. Friends on the east-coast regarded this as a deficiency, though often they pitched their criticisms from the shores of Lake Champlain.

Despite or rather because of my distant relationship with the ocean I grew-up fascinated with whales. They were mythically intriguing. The blue whale, the largest animal in history. Sperm whales diving to benthal depths, tangled in mortal battle with giant squids. Whales with tusks growing out of their heads, beaked whales, white whales, whales that “sing” rather than talk. And dolphins. The military precision of orcas. Spinner dolphins erupting from the water in acrobatic pinwheels. Dolphins in the rivers of China (sadly, no more), in the Amazon River, in the Indus and Ganges Rivers, silently passing unwitting bathers in Kolkata. To a child, whales were unimaginably titanic. But their physical immensity was counterbalanced by their immense grace, gliding through the water like smoke through the air, oneirically drifting through a world I knew nothing about.

And though we occupy wholly separate environments – and degrees of grandeur – whales and I do share one admittedly dull thing in common; we belong to the same taxonomic class, Mammalia. This was a peculiar and romantic fact for a hyperactive young boy to learn: Whales and I weren’t so different after all. When at the pool, or particularly the ocean, I was a whale. I mimicked their underwater arias as I had learned them from my whale-song cassette tapes. I breached like a grey whale, and jubilantly crashed back into my own wake. I rose to the surface, expelling then taking a breath as I slowly submerged, exposing my imaginary dorsal fin. And the last you would see of me before I dove to the deep-end of the pool would be my splayed feet pressed together, my pale, idiosyncratic and admittedly poor excuse for a tailfin disappearing into the water.

But that wasn’t enough. When I was 8, my family and I took a summer vacation to visit our large extended family in Massachusetts, and I insisted we go whale watching. I vigilantly scanned the water, leaning out over the boat’s railing. There! I spotted the dorsal fin of a northern minke whale off the port side. I mistakenly though proudly observed to my mom that the minke is the smallest of the baleen whales. And then, there! A pod of humpback whales cruised out of sight on the starboard bow. I stared at them as long as I could. Soon, the sheen of their backs blended into the waves’ topography and they were gone. Headed back to land, the Dramamine kicked in and I fell asleep slumped over the forward pulpit. That was the closest I have ever been to whales, the closest I have come to sharing more than biology with them, to sharing intimate physical space. But now, I would have that chance. My whale was waiting patiently on Wildcat Beach.

***

Lodged in the sand, tugged at by the waves, lay the giant skull of an unknown whale. That was all. A venue of vultures, perched on the sandy cliffs above the bones, leered at me. My disappointment brooded, but when I approached the skull that emotion gave way to childlike wonder. Jutting out of the sand, it looked like the broken wings of a profane angel or the throne of an ill-tempered sea-god. The structure was complex but orderly. There were tunnels and plains. Here the bone was convex. And here it was concave. Here were two protrusions that looked like cane handles. The bone was the color of buttermilk and tendrils of ghost-white flesh dangled from it. There were so many questions. Where did the whale come from? How did it die? How long had it been here? What kind of whale was it? Had it visited the Arctic? Hawaii? Australia? I wanted to ask it how vast the Pacific Ocean truly is, how deep, how populous, how can I help? But there were no answers. I stood on the skull. I watched the waves wrap around and submerge it, wondering what would happen to it when I left. I found a sandy chunk of blubber, as long and thick as my thigh, a few yards from the skull. I poked at it with my pocket-knife, and then tossed it down for the vultures. I looked up at them and they shifted uncomfortably. I set my backpack down at the bottom of the cliff, at least a dozen feet from the lip of the tide. I picked up a rock, went down on my knees in the water and banged on the bone to test its strength. The rock crumbled. I stood up, backed away, and threw the rock at a thin flat portion of the bone, and the rock glanced off of it. I tried again. This time, the bone broke away, and a shard the size and shape of a book of poetry fell into the waves, from which I plucked it. As I walked back to pick up my bag, the tide suddenly rose, and the waves, cold and furry and black, seemed to reach for my backpack. I cannot say why I felt the need to take a piece of the whale with me, but that is what I did, waves be damned.

***

I had been told that the bloated carcass of a 40-foot female humpback whale was beached on the north shore of Wildcat Beach more than a week ago. This whale was struck by the fierce blades of a giant shipping tanker, fracturing its skull. It was gnawed at by sharks as it floated past the Golden Gate Bridge, past the cliffs that palisade the beaches, thirty-plus miles along the coast of Point Reyes National Seashore. It was deposited on the graveyard beach to rot unless the waves saw fit to retrieve it. My intention was to see this whale, to touch it, to commune with it. I didn’t find it, and I don’t know where it is.

I ran twelve miles through the forest, over and down a mountain both ways. My shirt was soaked through with sweat, and, having foolishly brought no water, my mouth was parched in the noonday heat. My legs burned, my hips ached, and my calves were strung like violin strings, but I never stopped running. To ignore and validate the pain, I gave it meaning, I constructed a narrative that explained how visiting the whale flooded a trough that had been empty within me from an early at age, at least as far back as my days spent breaching out of the shallow end of the pool and into the sunlight. Having earned it, I can now say that I have a relationship with the ocean, and, as far as I see it, a piece of a childhood dream.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Repost

(The following posts were published on my now defunct blog "The Disbeliever.")

Game Language

I've recently noticed the proliferation of the phrase "game the system." Where I have encountered it, this phrase is typically employed to describe the misuse of social and government systems.
Please regard this most recent usage: "Mr. Castellani voiced strong support for the accountability principles underlying the original law and warned that the draft would allow too many schools to “
game the system” by hiding the records of underachieving student," editorial, New York Times; 12 September.
Also:"Some way or other, we all pay the price for Family and Medical Leave Act abuses...For workers, misuse contributes to unwanted overtime, loss of vacation time and ultimately low employee morale. No one wants to cover for co-workers who
game the system for an extra day off," ForbesMagazine; 9 September.
And:"We're concerned that it may provide too many opportunities for schools to
game the system and obscure the fact that students are not progressing toward reading and doing math at grade level," attributed to Arthur Rothkopf, a senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, San Francisco Chronicle; 9 September.

According to Dictionary.com, the American Heritage Dictionary doesn't recognize the use of "game" as a verb. But, it does list ten different uses of the word as a noun, in addition to adjectival and adverbial variants.
The OED does list "game" as a verb, primarily connoting amusement. The definition of "game" most applicable to the phrase in question--and even this takes some amount of mental calisthenics--is the third the intransitive one, derived from gambling, which is, at best, marginally useful.

The most suitable definition I could find during a fairly extensive search, was on the Wikitruth site: "Gaming the System means, simply, using the rules, policies and procedures of a system against itself for purposes outside what these rules were intended for." But even this falls short of providing adequate understanding of the intended usage in the quotes listed above. As deployed there, "game the system" is used to imply the exploitation of loopholes in a given code, allowing individuals to take unfair advantage of services and privileges. These advantages do not necessarily lie outside of the intended usage of the code. Instead, they represent unforeseen flaws, which are then utilized by the wily and informed to gain an advantage. Some find this disturbing rather than cunning.

The Chronicle piece provides an interesting and unassuming gloss of "game the system":" [U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret] Spellings and business groups warn that it could create a confusing new accountability system for parents, which might allow some states or individual schools to rig the results," (emphasis added). Considering this, the parlor etymology of the phrase is less a chance than a sure bet.

I've forwarded this inquiry to William Safire, the NYTime's resident militant-grammarian. I'm doubting he'll give it more than a passing glance, but it would be edifying and entertaining to better understand the etymological roots of the phrase, especially it's nascence as accepted usage.

-----------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

The Outdoor Retailer Show's Outdoor Demo Day

What follows are quotes from my notebook after a day spent at the "Open Air Demo" portion of the Outdoor Retailer Trade Show. Some holes are filled by the notes, but a little supplementary info is probably necessary.

The "OR," as it is lovingly referred to by industry insiders, is held biannually. It is an industry exclusive event, and the consuming public cannot attend. The OR is owned by Nielsen Company, which was originally a Dutch media conglomerate called "Verenigde Nederlandse Uitgeversbedrijven, which translates into as "United Dutch Publishing Companies" (wikipedia). You are probably most familiar with the company's music sales tracking division called Nielsen SoundScan. It also owns a marketing firm (ACNielsen), and several entertainment industry magazines (Billboard, Kirkus Reviews) and the Clio Awards, an advertising and design award show.

I was told by a representative from Sierra Designs that the OR recently celebrated its 25th anniversary. The OR will be in Salt Lake until 2010.
The Open Air Demo took place at Pineview Reservoir in Huntsville, Utah. It was mainly a man-powered water-craft exhibition. Every imaginable iteration of canoe, kayak, and paddle-board was available for personal demonstration.

There were also shoes, sunglasses, fans, socks, grills, hammocks, tents, coolers, backpacks, a DJ spinning an eclectic mix of adult favorites, trucks, swag, molded polymers whose intended use was unidentifiable without explanation and demonstration, and beer available at the giant Coleman truck parked at the entrance to the demo itself. The lady with the doubly pierced lip and a hoop through each nostril was kind enough to offer me three 16 oz cans of beer which I gladly accepted and for which I tipped a dollar each. She was excited beyond description with her job: I can't blame her.

THE NOTES
~Sandals appear to be the footwear of choice, though they are removed once people realize the difficulty of walking across medium-coarse sand at a severe cant in strong winds.

~A tent belonging to a kayak demonstrator was uprooted by the wind and blown crashing into a sock display and tent. A woman in a red swimsuit hurled herself bodily out of what she assumed was the course of the tent. An inordinate number of shirtless men ran with determination to remedy the collision.

~It's almost a rule-of-engagement that given such a situation more men than are possibly necessary think themselves so and come sprinting to assistance.

~Even the men have shaved legs, most bicyclists of some brand or else serious endurance athletes--and the high concentration of shorts display bulging calves on men and women as well as sometimes enormous varicose (from the Latin "varix" meaning "twisted;" caused by decreased elasticity of veins--typically in the legs--, weakening of the valves within those veins, and pooling of blood there that should be flowing to the heart) veins.

~The chatter in the Le Bus that's taking us to Pineview is constant--gulls at the beach picking at and fighting over a dead crab ubiquitous--and it's difficult to pick out any conversation that doesn't somehow rotate around the word "beer," which recalls a commercial for a popular domestic ultra-light beer depicting a man perspiring heavily as he chugs away on his road-bike, backgrounded by images of his other pursuits--hiking, kayaking, swimming, running, partying, climbing, women--that 1) illustrates the mind-numbing variety of out-door activities a single person can engage in, 2) highlights social pressures (expressed through any number of media outlets and social bodies) to maintain an active lifestyle fueled by consumption (which is also a pithy encapsulation of the OR at first glance), and 3) exposes the connection b/n doing things outside and drinking beer--a diuretic, cancer-causing, addictive, and completely delicious and refreshing beverage--, a connection seemingly existent between it (i.e. beer) and pretty much any activity alcohol producers can conceivably exploit (i.e.means every single one).

~As one might expect, the obesity quotient among exhibitors and retailers (and their dogs) probably resides in the single to negative digits.

~Everyone has their own business card (except me) and they all want to give me one.

~If I am unable to discern the use of the molded-polymer item you are exhibiting in a prone state I probably don't need one.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Pot is Bad: Disinformation is Worse

An article posted to the BBC's news Web-site today reviews a recent publication by the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (MRINz) that notes new-found adverse effects of "cannabis use" on the lungs.

An initial e-mail to the MRINZ and a request to obtain the study has gone unanswered.

According to the BBC's reportage, researchers report that there is damage to numerous lung functions as well as lung composition, i.e. coughing and wheezing, and the reduction of "large airways in the lungs."

It fails, however, to state the extent of the damage.

On the other hand, it explains that pot does not cause the crippling, chronic, and terminal lung degeneration disease emphysema, which, as noted by the US Center for Disease Control in a June '06 press release, killed almost 2.4 million people in America based on estimates made in 2004, the earliest year available from which to draw statistics. That report says that emphysema killed 801 per 100,000 Americans that year.

This is not an insignificant observation. The BBC article (and the MRINZ study by association (until further information reveals otherwise)) makes as if to highlight the similar health-risks posed by tobacco and marijuana use.

The BBC quotes the author of the study as saying that "one joint of cannabis was similar to 2.5 to five tobacco cigarettes in terms of causing airflow obstruction." This statement fails to denote whether they are referencing filtered or unfiltered cigarettes.

This statement is, essentially, the crux of the article, and its reason for inclusion on the BBC's front-page news, and it appears to lay out logical traps derived though assumption.

The severe health damage caused by cigarettes is public knowledge. By drawing analogies and pointing out similarities--though apparently minor--between marijuana and tobacco, the article encourages us to associate the former with the latter, and to make the requisite assumptions of both. Following the logic recommended by the article, one could safely assume that if smoking cigarettes reduces one's life expectancy by 14 years, smoking marijuana should reduce it by 35 to 70 years. A minor review of the available research cataloging the effects of both substances suggests that such an assumption would be foolish to maintain.

The legality and health-risks of cigarettes and tobacco are surprisingly dissimilar. The former is available on the free market and its use has been shown to cause "1 in every 5 deaths in America each year;" the latter, which is essentially legal in only two nations on the planet, has never been shown to increase mortality, and has been documented to be the cause of few, if any respiratory diseases. Tobacco use has been documented as a major cause of numerous cancers, and many respiratory and coronary diseases.

According to the BBC, the MRINZ study notes that the pulmonary damage caused by cannabis use is principally the result of how it is commonly smoked, without the aid of a filter, as opposed to most cigarettes

They said the impact of cannabis was likely to be due to the way in which cannabis joints are smoked - joints do not usually have filters, and they reach higher temperatures with users inhaling more deeply and holding their breath for longer than cigarette smokers.

That suggests that the restructuring of state regulation of marijuana by rewriting or scraping existing restrictions on the cultivation, production, and marketing of it could potentially mitigate at least some of the adverse health effects of smoking it. Relaxation or erasure of those restrictions would conceivably release marijuana into the free-market where it could be effectively and safely produced and marketed with a filter to refine the smoke as it is inhaled.

The article does not mention whether the study included both filtered and filter-less cigarettes.

It is important to note that existing cigarette filter technology can be undermined by a smoker if he/she accidentally or knowingly obstructs the flow of air through the ventilation holes punched through the circumference of the filter's end, thus inhaling smoke less adulterated by exposure to air. That smoke contains more tar and nicotine than would be received if the cigarette were smoked with the ventilation holes (which are more numerous in so-called "light" and "ultra-light" cigarettes) uncovered. Filters have been shown (refer to previous link) to be effective in reducing tar and nicotine when correctly used.

It should also be acknowledged that, whereas filters serve to dilute the nicotene content of tobacco cigarettes, one would assume with some great deal of certainty that they would have the same effect of reducing THC--the active ingredient in marijuana--content. It would also seem reasonable to draw the conclusion that people smoke cannabis principally for the uptake of THC, and would thus be unlikely to pay for and smoke marijuana cigarettes if they were receiving less THC than they would be by rolling their own.

The MRINZ is an independent medical research laboratory in Wellington, NZ. It's efforts are primarily directed at public health concerns, such as alcohol and drug abuse, asthma, and pharmacovigilance (the study of the maintenance of the adverse effects of medicaments).

A follow-up to this post will be made when/if a reply from the MRINZ is received.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

At Your Service: Reviewing the East Bay's Houses of Worship

The New Mt. Hermon M.B.C (Missionary Baptist Church)
- Lake Merritt / San Antonio District













Pastor:
Rev. Clyde H. Ignont, Jr.


Presiding Pastor: Rev. McKinley (whose first name I was unable to acquire)

Attendance: 31 adults and children

Service Length: 2 hours, including opening call and response prayer.

Sample Worshiper Dress: Black t-shirts, jungle cat- and zebra-print dresses, suit-coats, and painfully small and pointy high-heels.

Distractions Observed: Text-messaging, a bottle of Vaseline, and a box of tissues.

DEVOTIONAL FERVOR:
Amidst the copious clapping and spirited invocations of praise, parishioners sang a number of high-energy songs of worship accompanied by lively drumming and smooth organ melodies. Reverend McKinley also gathered them in hand-in-hand prayer at the foot of the altar on two occasions.
A particularly spirited female worshiper was fully taken by the preacher's message, and, apparently on the verge of tears, she was hollering loudly in praise in the church's outer foyer. Several of the younger worshipers were distracted from their devotions and unable to keep a straight face. The woman then burst into the service, ran around the auditorium a couple of times, danced in front of the drum set, and then breathlessly stood with the congregation. Grade: B+

FOOD FOR THE SOUL:
The Reverend McKinley, claiming that all he knows how to do is "preach expository," focused his homily on the later half of Genesis 8, wherein, on the first of the year, Noah debarks from the ark (dearks?) after the flood to find the land dry, thanks to the mercy and blessings of the Lord. Following a rather dry and academic preface to the passage in question, McKinley lit the fuse and burned along steadily as he interpreted the reading as one of hope for prosperity and faith in the new year. He implored parishioners to get out of the box (as he translated the word "ark") after a year beset by hardship and rain, to praise the Lord for his mercy and salvation, and, as the fuse burned down and lit the powder, he erupted into full-blown Gospel worship, the parishioners participating in rousing call and response as the drums and organ kicked in. Grade: B

FOOD FOR THE BODY:
Even after a rousing and, for some, athletic service, neither food nor beverages were offered to the congregation, but I did notice a small jar of peppermint candies up on the altar, the Pastor's own stash, one would assume. Grade: D+

OVERALL WORSHIP POWER:
The New Mt. Hermon church is an inclusive and gracious house of worship. Its members displayed enthusiasm, endurance, and obvious devotion to their beliefs. They enjoy their worship, the visiting Reverend McKinley obviously knew his scriptures, and the drummer was really good. Grade: B

(Note: I would like to acknowledge and give my thanks and gratitude to Aaron Leitko and the Washington City Paper for the idea for this column.)